(1) article in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung of 9:12:10 on the 49th Working Meeting of the Southwest German working group for urban history in Esslingen am Neckar
The section of my presentation: "A decline in public memory culture diganostizierte the art historian Martin Höppl (Munich) since the early days were squares and promenades, carefully usually with monuments, sculptors and architects. planned. I stand before the entrance to a city an equestrian statue of Kaiser Wilhelm, be it today a bank building. Given the geographical proximity could Höppl not fail also a dig at "Stuttgart 21". "
It is somewhat abbreviated form, that savings bank buildings were built on the site of monuments. But that is on the small space in such an article not too different To make the passage with the dig at S21.
" parties adhere to the city room discussion in 1900 in Munich, nor art historians and theorists such as space and Heinrich August Schmarsow Wölfflin, Psychologists such as Theodor Lipps, and theoretically ambitious sculptors and architects such as Adolf von Hildebrand and Theodor Fischer, a regulated exchange on these issues is lacking today in many places. So it was for separation of architectural and urbanistic issues traffic-engineering projects come, as in the case of Stuttgart 21 The architectural historian Vittorio Magnago Lampugnani commented on the debate recently in a Germany radio interview, and noted that it does not address could a building monuments, such as the railway station Bonatz awarded "as a relic" and negotiate isolates the free-form design. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment